I know that a lot of families have “broken down” because a member is gay/lesbian/transgender/bisexual. These families simply cannot accept the fact that a loved one has chosen to be himself or herself and has decided not to succumb to the norm or to the dictates of society.
But I want to ask you now…
Do you really have to sever your ties with a family member, your own flesh and blood, just because he or she is a homosexual?
Case in point: Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen who just announced via his commencement speech at a Phnom Penh university (no less) that he has dumped his adopted daughter because she was a lesbian and currently has a wife.
“My adopted daughter now has a wife. I’m quite disappointed,” he said.
Sen also said that he intends to go to court to have his daughter formally disowned so that she could not claim any inheritance.
“We are concerned that she might one day cause us trouble … and try to stake her claim for a share of our assets,” he said.
You know what bothers me?
First off, the gall of a Prime Minister at that to wash dirty laundry in public! Was it really necessary to do so? Was it the right forum to do so?
What was the motive of all that? Money? Was he just scared that this yet unnamed adopted daughter would go after his wealth? Or was he more scared of the humiliation that this “realization” would cause his name?
Secondly, I don’t understand why he had to use words like “disappointed” or “cause us trouble” or “try to stake her claim.” He was disappointed exactly because…? Disappointed because he really thought his adopted daughter would go marry a prince from a far away land and will bear a million male heirs? Disappointed because she instead was true to herself and followed her heart? Or was he simply disappointed because she was a lesbian and lesbians may just cause trouble and may try to stake a claim at his wealth?
Exactly why was he disappointed?
Thirdly, it’s very weird (and unfatherly-like) to think so badly of your daughter. After those years of rearing her, you entertain the possibility that she might cause trouble?
Fine, it’s true that she’s only adopted and that she’s not your own flesh and blood anyway. However, being a father should not stop just because she’s a lesbian. Being a father should not stop just because she’s adopted. Being a father - being a true father, that is - should start as soon as you accept and recognize the responsibility of taking care of a human being. Once you accept that, then there’s literally no turning back. Now if this realization that your adopted daughter is a lesbian is really something that you can’t accept, can’t you just fix things behind closed doors?
I can’t believe a Prime Minister and a father at that could act so crudely, so tactlessly and so heartlessly before the public.